Difference between revisions of "Tools Comparison 2022"
From BioUML platform
Ilya Kiselev (Talk | contribs) |
Ilya Kiselev (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| - | | - | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |6. Jupyter notebooks | ||
+ | | + | ||
+ | | - | ||
+ | | + | ||
+ | | + | ||
+ | | - | ||
+ | | - | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | } | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |''' | + | |'''Model formalism''' |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 193: | Line 202: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |3. SBGN | + | |3. SBML fbc |
+ | | fully, all tests passed | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |4. SBGN PD | ||
| + | | + | ||
| export | | export | ||
Line 202: | Line 220: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5. SBGN-ML PD |
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |6. SedML | ||
| + | | + | ||
| + | | + | ||
Line 211: | Line 238: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |7. Combine archive |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 220: | Line 247: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |8. SBOL |
| - | | - | ||
| - | | - | ||
Line 229: | Line 256: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |9. Antimony |
| + (in standalone) | | + (in standalone) | ||
| - | | - | ||
Line 238: | Line 265: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |10. Bionetgen |
| + (in standalone) | | + (in standalone) | ||
| - | | - | ||
Line 247: | Line 274: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |11. BioPAX |
| + | | + | ||
| - | | - |
Revision as of 16:05, 7 February 2022
Here we collect information about similar software and their features in comparison with BioUML.
This comparison was made in February 2022. Previous was done in 2019 and is available at separate page Tools Comparison.
BioUML | COPASI | iBioSim | CellDesigner | Tellurium | Morpheus | libRoadRunner | |||||||||
Capabilities | |||||||||||||||
1. Model creation | visual\text-based | via tables | visual | visual | text-based | via tables | |||||||||
2. Simulation | + | + | + | via ext.tools | + | + | + | ||||||||
3. Parameter fitting | + | + | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
4. Model analysis | + | + | + | - | + | + | |||||||||
5. Database access | + | - | + | + | - | - | 6. Jupyter notebooks | + | - | + | + | - | - |
} | |
Model formalism | |||||||||||||||
1. ODE | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
2. Stochastic Gillespie-type | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
3. Algebraic | + | - | + | - | + | + | |||||||||
4. Discrete | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
5. Flux balance | |||||||||||||||
6. Modular modeling | + | - | + | - | + | + | |||||||||
7. Mixed formalisms | + | - | - | - | - | + | |||||||||
8. Agent-based | + | - | + | - | - | - | |||||||||
9. Rule-based | + | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
10. Population-based | + | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Standards | |||||||||||||||
1. SBML | l3v2, all tests passed | l3v1 except algebraic | l3v1 | l3v1 | l3v1 | l3v1, partially | |||||||||
2. SBML comp | fully, all tests passed | - | partially | - | partially | partially | |||||||||
3. SBML fbc | fully, all tests passed | ||||||||||||||
4. SBGN PD | + | export | - | + | - | - | |||||||||
5. SBGN-ML PD | |||||||||||||||
6. SedML | + | + | - | - | + | - | |||||||||
7. Combine archive | |||||||||||||||
8. SBOL | - | - | + | - | - | - | |||||||||
9. Antimony | + (in standalone) | - | - | - | + | - | |||||||||
10. Bionetgen | + (in standalone) | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
11. BioPAX | + | - | - | + | - | - | |||||||||
Availability | |||||||||||||||
1. Windows | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
2. Linux | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
3. MacOS | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
4. Web application | + | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||
Programming Language | Java | C++ | Java | Java | Python | C++ |