Covid 19
Contents |
Epidemiological models
Authors | Publication date | Geographical region | Type | Description | Predictions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferguson et al[1] | 16.03.2020 | UK and USA | Stochastic model | CovidSim models the transmission dynamics and severity of COVID-19 infections throughout a spatially and socially structured population over time. It enables modelling of how intervention policies and healthcare provision affect the spread of COVID-19. It is used to inform health policy by making quantitative forecasts of (for example) cases, deaths and hospitalisations, and how these will vary depending on which specific interventions, such as social distancing, are enacted. With parameter changes, it can be used to model other respiratory viruses, such as influenza. | In the absence of control measures Ferguson et al. estimated the peak mortality would occur after approximately 3 months (estimated R0 of 2.4) with an 81% of the GB and US populations infected over the course of the epidemic. In an unmitigated epidemic, they predict approximately 510,000 deaths in GB and 2.2 million in the US would occur. |
Chen et al[2] | 28.01.2020 | Wuhan, China | SEIR (several species) | Model described virus transmission between bets (possible source), unknown host and human. For every species SEIR model is implemented. Simplified model with only human species is also considered. | The value of R0 was estimated of 2.30 from reservoir to person and 3.58 from person to person which means that the expected number of secondary infections that result from introducing a single infected individual into an otherwise susceptible population was 3.58. |
Wu et al.[3] | 31.01.2020 | Wuhan / China | SEIR | Model was created to reflect data obtained in Wuhan, then the model was extrapolated on China overall, taking into account cities connection with Wuhan and major routes of air and train transport | R0 for 2019-nCoV is 2.68, 75 815 individuals have been infected in Wuhan as of Jan 25, 2020. The epidemic doubling time was 6.4 days. Chongqing, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen had imported 461, 113, 98, 111, and 80 infections from Wuhan, respectively. Epidemics are already growing exponentially in multiple major cities of China with a lag time behind the Wuhan of about 1–2 weeks. On the present trajectory, 2019-nCoV could be about to become a global epidemic in the absence of mitigation.To possibly succeed, substantial, even draconian measures that limit population mobility should be seriously and immediately considered in affected areas. |
Danon et al.[4] | 14.02.2020 | England and Whales | SEIR+Spatial | Authors used preexisted spatial metapopulation model to describe population movement between regions in England and Whales and standard SEIR model to describe Covid-19 spread in each particular region. | CoVID-19 outbreak will peak 126 to 147 days (~4 months) after the start of person-to-person transmission in England and Wales in the absence of controls, epidemic peak is predicted in June. |
Westerhoff and Kolodkin[5] | 30.03.2020 | Not specified | modified SEIR | Model distinguished between tested and non-testes subjects and takes into consideration adaptive government-induces social distancing policy | Strategies aiming for herd immunity are unacceptable and that a much stronger lockdown is required. Results suggest that the measures taken by many policy makers will be insufficient to quench the epidemic. Some Western policy makers engage in an adaptive lock down strategy but one of insufficient strength: model results suggest that their slowly increasing lock down strategy will not be effective. What is necessary is a strong lock down, which may then be softened as the number of infected individuals begins to decrease with time. |
Tutu.ru[6] | 30.03.2020 | Russian Federation | SIR + Spatial | Model uses dataset acquired by tutu.ru for movement statistics between nearly 170 000 Russian cities, villages and other inhabited localities. It investigates effects of restrictions on transition between cities on Covid19 spread. For each city simple SIR model is used. | Due to highly uneven population density (high in the western part and low in the eastern) it is possible to change epidemic timing by restricting movement between main transport hubs which will probably be economically justified in the future. |
Chang et al.[7] | 02.04.2020 | Australia | Agent-based | AceMod (The Australian Census-based Epidemic Model), containing 24 million agents, each of which represents individual with his own characteristics (gender, occupation, susceptibility) and social context. AceMod was previously developed and validated for simulations of pandemic influenza in Australia. Currently it was calibrated to describe covid-19 pandemic. | Effectiveness of school closures is limited, producing a two-week delay in epidemic peak, without a significant impact on the magnitude of the peak, in terms of incidence or prevalence. The temporal benefit of the two-week delay may be offset not only by logistical complications, but also by some increases in the fractions of both children and older adults during the period around the incidence peak. Social distancing (SD) strategy showed no benefit for lower levels of compliance (at 70% or less). Increasing a compliance level just by 10%,from 70% to 80%, may effectively control the spread of COVID-19 in Australia (during the suppression period). |
Адарченко и др. | 29.05.2020 | Россия | SEIRD and Agent-based | Проведено моделирование развития эпидемии COVID-19 с целью предсказания ее параметров в зависимости от принимаемых мер противодействия: средней длительности эпидемии, наличия второго и/или последующих пиков заболеваемости, максимальной нагрузки на систему здравоохранения. Рассмотрено два подхода: детерминистский и статистический, которые используют методы теории нелинейных дифференциальных уравнений и «агентного» моделирования на основе метода Монте-Карло. Приводятся результаты моделирования развития эпидемии в Москве, Ухане и Нью-Йорке. | Учет асимптомных зараженных в детерменированной модели позволит показать, что расчеты модели принципиально не изменились, но максимумы пиков заражения стали меньше по сравнению с моделью без учета асимптомных в популяции. Полученные расчетные данные агентной модели показывают, что принимаемые властями ограничительные меры дают свой эффект, и в ряде регионов число заражений уже идет на спад. Однако это не означает, что после отмены карантинов эпидемия не может вспыхнуть вновь. |
Westerhoff&Kolodkin [8] | 12.06.2020 | The Netherlands | SEIR | Using standard systems biology methodologies a 14-compartment dynamic model was developed for the Coronavirus epidemic. | The model predicts that: (i) it will be impossible to limit lockdown intensity such that sufficient herd immunity develops for this epidemic to die down, (ii) the death toll from the SARS-CoV-2 virus decreases very strongly with increasing intensity of the lockdown, but (iii) the duration of the epidemic increases at first with that intensity and then decreases again, such that (iv) it may be best to begin with selecting a lockdown intensity beyond the intensity that leads to the maximum duration, (v) an intermittent lockdown strategy should also work and might be more acceptable socially and economically, (vi) an initially intensive but adaptive lockdown strategy should be most efficient, both in terms of its low number of casualties and shorter duration, (vii) such an adaptive lockdown strategy offers the advantage of being robust to unexpected imports of the virus, e.g. due to international travel, (viii) the eradication strategy may still be superior as it leads to even fewer deaths and a shorter period of economic downturn, but should have the adaptive strategy as backup in case of unexpected infection imports, (ix) earlier detection of infections is the most effective way in which the epidemic can be controlled, whilst waiting for vaccines. |
Teslya et al.[9] | 21.07.2020 | The Netherlands and Portugal | SEIR | Authors developed a deterministic compartmental transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 in a population stratified by disease status (susceptible, exposed, infectious with mild or severe disease, diagnosed, and recovered) and disease awareness status (aware and unaware) due to the spread of COVID-19. Self-imposed measures were assumed to be taken by disease aware individuals and included handwashing, mask-wearing, and social distancing. Government-imposed social distancing reduced the contact rate of individuals irrespective of their disease or awareness status. The model was parameterized using current best estimates of key epidemiological parameters from COVID-19 clinical studies. | The model outcomes included the peak number of diagnoses, attack rate, and time until the peak number of diagnoses. For fast awareness spread in the population, self-imposed measures can significantly reduce the attack rate and diminish and postpone the peak number of diagnoses. They estimate that a large epidemic can be prevented if the efficacy of these measures exceeds. 50%. For slow awareness spread, self-imposed measures reduce the peak number of diagnoses and attack rate but do not affect the timing of the peak. Early implementation of short-term government-imposed social distancing alone is estimated to delay (by at most 7 months for a 3-month intervention) but not to reduce the peak. The delay can be even longer and the height of the peak can be additionally reduced if this intervention is combined with self-imposed measures that are continued after government-imposed social distancing has been lifted. Our analyses are limited in that they do not account for stochasticity, demographics, heterogeneities in contact patterns or mixing, spatial effects, imperfect isolation of individuals with severe disease, and reinfection with COVID-19. |
Paiva et al. [10] | 31.07.2020 | China, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and the USA | SEIR | The model is based on an approach previously used to describe the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) epidemic. This methodology is used to describe the COVID-19 dynamics in six countries where the pandemic is widely spread, namely China, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and the USA. For this purpose, data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) are adopted. | The developed formula for R0 shows a strong influence on the human-to-human transmission rate β, followed by the relative transmissibility of hospitalized patients ℓ and of the asymptomatic infected ℓa. By evaluating the estimated values authorities can grasp which actions are more likely to yield more meaningful results. For example, considering that for a country the value of β has stalled, whereas ℓa is still relatively high, measures to reduce the social contact of asymptomatic individuals appear as promising alternatives, instead of simply isolating the symptomatic individuals. |
Canabarro et al. [11] | 30.07.2020 | Brazil | SIRD | A data-driven age-structured census-based SIRD-like epidemiological model capable of forecasting the spread of COVID-19 in Brazil has been proposed. | The developed model demonstrates the early NPI (non-pharmaceutical interventions) measures taken by states and cities such as the total closure
of schools, universities and non-essential services, the social distancing and isolation of individuals above 60 years and the voluntary home quarantine have already lead to a significant reduction in the number of infections as well as delaying the time for the peak of contamination. Thus, these measures have been extremely important to give the authorities the necessary time for adapting and preparing before the peak of the epidemy. The model predicts that even if the current NPIs are not relaxed, as early as mid-April the number of severe cases requiring hospitalization will surpass the current number of available ICUs, starting the collapse of the health system. However, an intense quarantine, if implemented in the following days, can rapidly change the increase in the number of infections and keep the demand for ICUs below the threshold, amounting to hundreds of thousands of saved lives. On the other hand, the model simulations demonstrate that the relaxation of the already imposed control measures in the next days, as currently debated at some sphere of the Brazilian federal government, would be catastrophic, with a total death toll passing the one million mark. |
Dobrovolny [12] | 10.08.2020 | California, Florida, New York and Texas | SAIRD | In this study, a compartmental mathematical model of a viral epidemic that includes asymptomatic infection to examine the role of asymptomatic individuals in the spread of the infection has been developed. | The developed model predicts that asymptomatic infections far outnumber reported symptomatic infections at the peak of the epidemic in all four states. The model suggests that relaxing of social distancing measures too quickly could lead to a rapid rise in the number of cases, driven in part by asymptomatic infections. |
Lyra et al. [13] | 02.09.2020 | Brazil | modified SEIR | Authours developed a modified SEIR model, including confinement, asymptomatic transmission, quarantine and hospitalization. The population is subdivided into 9 age groups, resulting in a system of 72 coupled nonlinear differential equations. The rate of transmission is dynamic and derived from the observed delayed fatality rate; the parameters of the epidemics are derived with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. We used Brazil as an example of the middle-income country, but the results are easily generalizable to other countries considering a similar strategy. | Authours found that starting from 60% horizontal confinement, an exit strategy on May 1st of confinement of individuals older than 60 years old and full release of the younger population results in 400 000 hospitalizations, 50 000 ICU cases, and 120 000 deaths in the 50-60 years old age group alone. Sensitivity analysis shows the 95% confidence interval brackets an order of magnitude in cases or three weeks in time. The health care system avoids collapse if the 50-60 years old are also confined, but the model assumes an idealized lockdown where the confined are perfectly insulated from contamination, so our numbers are a conservative lower bound. Our results
discourage confinement by age as an exit strategy. |
Barbarossa et al. [14] | 04.09.2020 | Germany | SEIR type is extended to account for undetected infections, stages of infection, and age groups | In this work, mathematical models are used to reproduce data of the early evolution of the COVID19 outbreak in Germany, taking into account the effect of actual and hypothetical non-pharmaceutical interventions. The models are calibrated on data until April 5. Data from April 6 to 14 are used for model validation. Authors simulate different possible strategies for the mitigation of the current outbreak, slowing down the spread of the virus and thus reducing the peak in daily diagnosed cases, the demand for hospitalization or intensive care units admissions, and eventually the number of fatalities. | The developed model predicts that a partial (and gradual) lifting of introduced control measures could soon be possible if accompanied by further increased testing activity, strict isolation of detected cases, and reduced contact to risk groups. |
Perkins et al. [15] | 21.08.2020 | USA | Stochastic simulation model | Authors developed an approach for estimating the number of unobserved infections based on data that are commonly available shortly after the emergence of a new infectious disease. The logic of our approach is, in essence, that there are bounds on the amount of exponential growth of new infections that can occur during the first few weeks after imported cases start appearing. | Applying that logic to data on imported cases and local deaths in the United States through 12 March, authors estimated that 108,689 (95% posterior predictive interval [95% PPI]: 1,023 to 14,182,310) infections occurred in the United States by this date. By comparing the model’s predictions of symptomatic infections with local cases reported over time, we obtained daily estimates of the proportion of symptomatic infections detected by surveillance. This revealed that detection of symptomatic infections decreased throughout February as an exponential growth of infections outpaced increases in testing. Between 24 February and 12 March, we estimated an increase in detection of symptomatic infections, which was strongly correlated (median: 0.98; 95% PPI: 0.66 to 0.98) with increases in testing. These results suggest that testing was a major limiting factor in assessing the extent of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during its initial invasion of the United States. |
Saad-Roy et al. [16] | 21.09.2020 | NA | SIR(S) | Authors developed simple epidemiological models to explore estimates for the magnitude and timing of future Covid-19 cases given different protective efficacy and duration of the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2, as well as its interaction with vaccines and nonpharmaceutical interventions. | The model analysis has shown that variations in the immune response to primary SARS-CoV-2 infections and a potential vaccine can lead to dramatically different immune landscapes and burdens of critically severe cases, ranging from sustained epidemics to near elimination. These findings illustrate likely complexities in future Covid-19 dynamics, and highlight the importance of immunological characterization beyond the measurement of active infections for adequately projecting the immune landscape generated by SARS-CoV-2 infections. |
Bretta&Rohani [17] | 22.09.2020 | UK | deterministic age-structured SEIR | Using an age-structured transmission model, parameterized to simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United Kingdom, authors assessed the long-term prospects of success using both of these approaches. Authors simulated a range of different nonpharmaceutical intervention scenarios incorporating social distancing applied to different age groups. | The model simulations confirmed that suppression of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is possible with plausible levels of social distancing over a period of months, consistent with observed trends. Notably, the model analysis did not support achieving herd immunity as a practical objective, requiring an unlikely balancing of multiple poorly defined forces. Specifically, authors found that 1) social distancing must initially reduce the transmission rate to within a narrow range, 2) to compensate for susceptible depletion, the extent of social distancing must be adaptive over time in a precise yet unfeasible way, and 3) social distancing must be maintained for an extended period to ensure the healthcare system is not overwhelmed. |
Wilder et al. [18] | 24.09.2020 | Hubei, Lombardy, and New York City | agent-based model | An individual-level model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission that accounts for population-specific factors such as age distributions, comorbidities, household structures, and contact patterns has been developed. | The effect of limiting contacts by a particular age group varies by location, indicating that strategies to reduce transmission should be tailored based on population-specific demography and social structure. These findings highlight the role of between-population variation in formulating policy interventions. Across the three populations, though, we find that targeted “salutary sheltering” by 50% of a single age group may substantially curtail transmission when combined with the adoption of physical distancing measures by the rest of the population. |
Waltemath et al. [19] | 02.10.2020 | N/A | different types | In a collaboration between the University of Greifswald, the Humboldt-University Berlin, code ahoi, and the BioModels database at EMBL-EBI, authours aim to rapidly disseminate simulation studies of COVID-19 models to the research community, in interoperable formats and in high quality.. | N/A. |
McCombs&Kadelka [20] | 15.10.2020 | N/A | Stochastic compartmental network model | A stochastic compartmental network model of SARS-CoV-2 spread explores the simultaneous effects of policy choices in three domains: social distancing, hospital triaging, and testing. Considering policy domains together provides insight into how different policy decisions interact. The model incorporates important characteristics of COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, such as heterogeneous risk factors and asymptomatic transmission, and enables a reliable qualitative comparison of policy choices despite the current uncertainty in key virus and disease parameters. | Results suggest possible refinements to current policies, including emphasizing the need to reduce random encounters more than personal contacts, and testing low-risk symptomatic individuals before high-risk symptomatic individuals. The strength of social distancing of symptomatic individuals affects the degree to which asymptomatic cases drive the epidemic as well as the level of population-wide contact reduction needed to keep hospitals below capacity. The relative importance of testing and triaging also depends on the overall level of social distancing. |
Russo et al. [21] | 30.10.2020 | Lombardy, Italy | SEIIRD | To deal with the uncertainty in the number of the actual asymptomatic infected cases in the total population Volpert et al. (2020), authors addressed a modified compartmental Susceptible/Exposed/ Infectious Asymptomatic/ Infected Symptomatic/ Recovered/ Dead (SEIIRD) model with two compartments of infectious persons: one modelling the cases in the population that are asymptomatic or experience very mild symptoms and another modelling the infected cases with mild to severe symptoms. The parameters of the model corresponding to the recovery period, the time from the onset of symptoms to death and the time from exposure to the time that an individual starts to be infectious, have been set as reported from clinical studies on COVID-19. For the estimation of the day-zero of the outbreak in Lombardy, as well as of the “effective” per-day transmission rate for which no clinical data are available, we have used the proposed SEIIRD simulator to fit the numbers of new daily cases from February 21 to the 8th of March. | Based on the proposed methodological procedure, authors estimated that the expected day-zero was January 14 (min-max rage: January 5 to January 23, interquartile range: January 11 to January 18). The actual cumulative number of asymptomatic infected cases in the total population in Lombardy on March 8 was of the order of 15 times the confirmed cumulative number of infected cases, while the expected value of the basic reproduction number R0 was found to be 4.53 (min-max range: 4.40- 4.65). On May 4, the date on which relaxation of the measures commenced the effective reproduction number was found to be 0.987 (interquartiles: 0.857, 1.133). The model approximated adequately two months ahead of time the evolution of reported cases of infected until May 4, the day on which the phase I of the relaxation of measures was implemented over all of Italy. Furthermore, the model predicted that until May 4, around 20% of the population in Lombardy has recovered (interquartile range: ~10% to ~30%). |
Zhan et al. [22] | 30.10.2020 | China | SEIR | This study integrates the daily intercity migration data with the classic Susceptible-ExposedInfected-Removed (SEIR) model to construct a new model suitable for describing the dynamics of epidemic spreading of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Daily intercity migration data for 367 cities in China were collected from Baidu Migration, a mobile-app based human migration tracking data system. Early outbreak data of infected, recovered and death cases from an official source (from January 24 to February 16, 2020) were used for model fitting. The set of model parameters obtained from best data fitting using a constrained nonlinear optimisation procedure was used for estimation of the dynamics of epidemic spreading in the following months. | The model results showed that the number of infections in most cities in China would peak between mid-February to early March 2020, with about 0.8%, less than 0.1% and less than 0.01% of the population eventually infected in Wuhan, Hubei Province and the rest of China, respectively. Moreover, for most cities outside and within Hubei Province (except Wuhan), the total number of infected individuals is expected to be less than 300 and 4000, respectively. |
Chang et al. [23] | 11.11.2020 | Australia | Agent-based modelling | Here authors report the results of agent-based modelling using a fine-grained computational simulation of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. This model is calibrated to match key characteristics of COVID-19 transmission. An important calibration outcome is the age-dependent fraction of symptomatic cases, with this fraction for children found to be one-fifth of such fraction for adults. Authors applied the model to compare several intervention strategies, including restrictions on international air travel, case isolation, home quarantine, social distancing with varying levels of compliance, and school closures. | School closures are not found to bring decisive benefits unless coupled with a high level of social distancing compliance. Authors report several trade-offs, and an important transition across the levels of social distancing compliance, in the range between 70% and 80% levels, with compliance at the 90% level found to control the disease within 13–14 weeks, when coupled with effective case isolation and international travel restrictions. |
Català et al. [24] | 09.12.2020 | several European countries | Gompertz model | Gompertz model has been shown to correctly describe the dynamics of cumulative confirmed cases, since it is characterized by a decrease in growth rate showing the effect of control measures. Thus, it provides a way to systematically quantify the Covid-19 spreading velocity and it allows short-term predictions and longer-term estimations. This model has been employed to fit the cumulative cases of Covid-19 from several European countries. | The modelling results show that there are systematic differences in spreading velocity among countries. The model predictions provide a reliable picture of the short-term evolution in countries that are in the initial stages of the Covid-19 outbreak, and may permit researchers to uncover some characteristics of the long-term evolution. These predictions can also be generalized to calculate short-term hospital and intensive care units (ICU) requirements. |
Web apps for Covid-19 simulations and data
1. Covid-19 statistics and forecast developed by Biouml.Ru;
4. A web application serves as a planning tool for COVID-19 outbreaks in communities across the world;
5. Los Alamos National Lab prediction;
6. University of Melburn prediction;
7. REINA (Realistic Epidemic Interaction Network Agent Model);
10. Sberindex;
11. Moscow map for coronavirus;
14. Covid-19 predictions for Kazakhstan;
15. Human Cell Atlas research on COVID-19;
17. COVID-19 Disease Map;
19. BBMRI-ERIC’s contributions to research and knowledge exchange on COVID-19
20. 91-DIVOC is home to many data-forward, high-quality, interactive, and informative visualizations
21. Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 over the next five
22. COVID-19 Pathways Portal on WikiPathways
23. Pathway figures related to COVID-19
24. COVID-19 Biomedical Knowledge Miner
25. COVID-19 Pandemic Resources at UCSC
26. WashU Virus Genome Browser
28. COVID-19 Projections for Russian Federation made by IHME
29. Web tools to fight pandemics: the COVID-19 experience
30. Tracking Cause of Death by State
31. European Virus Bioinformatics Center
32. COVID-19 Event Risk Assessment Planning Tool
33. LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature
34. COVID-KOP: Integrating Emerging COVID-19 Data with the ROBOKOP Database
36. COVID-19 mapper
38. Taxameter, frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations in regions of Russia
39. CoVariants, SARS-CoV-2 variants and mutations
40. Nextstrain, Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus
41. GLEAM Global epidemic and mobility model
42. VGARus (Virus Genome Aggregator of Russia)
Covid-19 statistics
2. UniOxford statistics and research;
3. Worldmeter;
6. OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England;
7. COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios;
8. Covid19 timeseries data store;
9. 2019 Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Data Repository by Johns Hopkins CSSE;
10. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard
11. Coronavirus (COVID-19) disease pandemic- Statistics & Facts
Useful articles
1. Coronavirus research updates ;
2. A Global Effort to Define the Human Genetics of Protective Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Infection;
4. Genomic determinants of pathogenicity in SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses;
7. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19;
9. Cross-reactive Antibody Response between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Infections;
10. These Scenarios Show What a Second Wave of COVID-19 Could Look Like;
11. Herd Immunity: Understanding COVID-19;
12. The race for coronavirus vaccines: a graphical guide;
14. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19;
15. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2;
16. Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 in Adolescents and Young Adults;
17. Positive COVID-19 Test Doesn't Automatically Equate to Virulence;
18. Why herd immunity to COVID-19 is reached much earlier than thought;
19. A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers;
20. Why do some COVID-19 patients infect many others, whereas most don’t spread the virus at all?;
21. Calibration of individual-based models to epidemiological data: A systematic review
22. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19.
23. Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies;
26. Natural History of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection
27. COVID-19: What proportion are asymptomatic?
28. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections
31. Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19
32. Rapid Generation of Neutralizing Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients
34. Intrafamilial Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 Induces Cellular Immune Response without Seroconversion
35. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing
37. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19
38. Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19
39. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes
42. The challenges of modeling and forecasting the spread of COVID-19
44. SARS‐CoV‐2 coinfections: Could influenza and the common cold be beneficial?
45. The Pandemic’s Big Mystery: How Deadly Is the Coronavirus?
46. Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France
47. Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions
49. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera
50. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients
51. Pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2: the knowns and unknowns
52. Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19
53. Spiking Pandemic Potential: Structural and Immunological Aspects of SARS-CoV-2
54. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients
55. BCG vaccine protection from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
57. The pandemic virus is slowly mutating. But does it matter?
58. Susceptible supply limits the role of climate in the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
59. The network effect: studying COVID-19 pathology with the Human Cell Atlas
60. Potential Causes and Consequences of Gastrointestinal Disorders during a SARS-CoV-2 Infection
62. Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020
64. Structural Basis for RNA Replication by the SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase
65. Mathematical models to guide pandemic response
66. Ranking the global impact of the coronavirus pandemic, country by country
67. SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract
68. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations
69. The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks
70. How does SARS-CoV-2 cause COVID-19?
71. The protein expression profile of ACE2 in human tissues
72. In vitro and in vivo identification of clinically approved drugs that modify ACE2 expression
73. A data-driven model to describe and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission
75. Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income
76. The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data
77. Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans
80. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
81. Timing social distancing to avert unmanageable COVID-19 hospital surges
82. Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection
84. A molecular pore spans the double membrane of the coronavirus replication organelle
85. The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARSCoV-2 Infection
86. Evolving social contact patterns during the COVID-19 crisis in Luxembourg
87. Monitoring Italian COVID-19 spread by a forced SEIRD model
88. Change in global transmission rates of COVID19 through May 6 2020
89. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans
90. Longitudinal evaluation and decline of antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection
92. Pathogenetic profiling of COVID-19 and SARS-like viruses
94. Predicting and analyzing the COVID-19 epidemic in China: Based on SEIRD, LSTM and GWR models
95. Systems-Level Immunomonitoring from Acute to Recovery Phase of Severe COVID-19
97. The Impact of Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Spike on Viral Infectivity and Antigenicity
98. Emerging Pandemic Diseases:How We Got to COVID-19
99. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans
101. How many people has the coronavirus killed?
103. Substantial underestimation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United States
105. In vivo antiviral host transcriptional response to SARS-CoV-2 by viral load, sex, and age
106. Open access data from the largest proteomics study on COVID-19 to date
107. Ultra-High-Throughput Clinical Proteomics Reveals Classifiers of COVID-19 Infection
108. Multiorgan and Renal Tropism of SARS-CoV-2
110. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe and North America
111. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus persistence in Vero cells
112. Human Coronavirus: Host-Pathogen Interaction
114. SARS-CoV-2 infection severity is linked to superior humoral immunity against the spike
116. Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severity
117. Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in two Indian states
118. The UCSC SARS-CoV-2 Genome Browser
119. Exploring the coronavirus pandemic with the WashU Virus Genome Browser
121. Pediatric SARS-CoV-2: Clinical Presentation, Infectivity, and Immune Responses
123. Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans
124. Loss of Bcl-6-Expressing T Follicular Helper Cells and Germinal Centers in COVID-19
125. Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19
126. COVID-19 Makes B Cells Forget, but T Cells Remember
127. Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity — A Strategy for Containment
131. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a case study
132. Will SARS-CoV-2 become endemic?
134. Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data
135. Comparative host-coronavirus protein interaction networks reveal pan-viral disease mechanisms
136. Coinfection with other respiratory pathogens in COVID-19 patients
137. COVID-19 and Excess All-Cause Mortality in the US and 18 Comparison Countries
138. Transcriptional and proteomic insights into the host response in fatal COVID-19 cases
142. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a case study
143. Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months
144. Emergence and spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020
145. Trends in COVID-19 Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates
146. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period
149. Preexisting and de novo humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in humans
151. A SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate would likely match all currently circulating variants
154. Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the prepandemic period in Italy
155. Prothrombotic autoantibodies in serum from patients hospitalized with COVID-19
156. Robust estimates of the true (population) infection rate for COVID-19: a backcasting approach
157. Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China
158. Transmission heterogeneities, kinetics, and controllability of SARS-CoV-2
159. Evolution of Antibody Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
163. SARS-CoV-2 epitopes are recognized by a public and diverse repertoire of human T cell receptors
164. No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
165. COVID-19 and cardiovascular diseases
166. Higher viral loads in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients might be the invisible part of the iceberg
167. Comparative host-coronavirus protein interaction networks reveal pan-viral disease mechanisms
170. Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany
171. Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impairs Dendritic Cell and T Cell Responses
172. Amplification-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 withCRISPR-Cas13a and mobile phone microscopy
173. Multi-Omics Resolves a Sharp Disease-State Shift between Mild and Moderate COVID-19
174. Quick COVID-19 Healers Sustain Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Production
175. Practical considerations for measuring the effective reproductive number, Rt
176. Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19
177. Public policy and economic dynamics of COVID-19 spread: A mathematical modeling study
178. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection
179. Cell-Type-Specific Immune Dysregulation in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients
180. Mathematical model of COVID-19 intervention scenarios for São Paulo—Brazil
181. In silico dynamics of COVID-19 phenotypes for optimizing clinical management
182. Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus
183. COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival
186. Evaluating epidemic forecasts in an interval format
Lectures and talks
2. Происхождение нового коронавируса. Сергей Нетёсов;
3. Коронавирус: Новые данные. Лекция Сергея Нетёсова;
4. Справилась ли Россия с пандемией коронавируса? С. Нетесов;
5. Маргарита Романенко"Тот самый вирус: все что вы хотели знать о COVID19, но стеснялись спросить";
6. Маргарита Романенко "Вакцина нашей надежды"
7. Viral Issue Crucial Update Sept 8th: the Science, Logic and Data Explained!
8. Prof. Paul Marik, COVID 19: A Clinical Update
Tutorials
Подготовленные в рамках проекта учебно-методические материалы выложены тут
Models developed in the project
Список созданных и воспроизведенных в рамках проекта математических моделей представлен тут
References
- ↑ Ferguson N., Laydon D., Nedjati Gilani G., Imai N., Ainslie K., Baguelin M., Bhatia S., Boonyasiri A., Cucunuba Perez Z.U., Cuomo-Dannenburg G., Dighe A. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. // Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team (2020). doi:https://dsprdpub.cc.ic.ac.uk:8443/bitstream/10044/1/77482/14/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf
- ↑ Chen T-M.,Rui J.,Wang Q-P.,Zhao Z., Cui J., Yin L. A mathematical model for simulating the phase-based transmissibility of a novel coronavirus // Infect Dis Poverty 9:24 (2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00640-3
- ↑ Wu J.T., Leung K., Leung G.M. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study // Lancet. 2020. 395: 689–97.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9
- ↑ Danon L., Brooks-Pollock E., Bailey M., Keeling M. A spatial model of CoVID-19 transmission in England and Wales: early spread and peak timing // medRxiv preprint 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.20022566
- ↑ Westerhoff H. V., Kolodkin A.N. Advice from a systems-biology model of the Corona epidemics// medRxiv preprint 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.29.20045039
- ↑ ttps://github.com/ods-ai-ml4sg/covid19-tutu
- ↑ Chang S.L., Harding N., Zachreson C., Cliff O.M., Prokopenko M. Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia // arxiv preprint 2020. doi:arxiv-2003.10218
- ↑ Westerhoff H.V., Kolodkin A.N. Advice from a systems-biology model of the corona epidemics // npj Syst Biol Appl 6, 18, 2020 doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-020-0138-8
- ↑ Teslya A, Pham TM, Godijk NG, Kretzschmar ME, Bootsma MCJ, Rozhnova G (2020) Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study. PLoS Med 17(7): e1003166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166
- ↑ Paiva H.M., Afonso R.J.M., de Oliveira I.L., Garcia G.F. A data-driven model to describe and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission// PLOS One 15, 5, 2020 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236386
- ↑ Canabarro A., Teno´rio E., Martins R., Martins L., Brito S., Chaves R. Data-driven study of the COVID-19 pandemic via age-structured modelling and prediction of the health system failure in Brazil amid diverse intervention strategies// PLOS One 15, 5, 2020 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236310
- ↑ Dobrovolny H.M. Modeling the role of asymptomatics in infection spread with application to SARS-CoV-2// PLoS ONE 15, 8, 2020: e0236976. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236976
- ↑ Lyra W., do Nascimento J-D., Jr., Belkhiria J., de Almeida L., Chrispim P.P.M., de Andrade I. (2020) COVID-19 pandemics modeling with modified determinist SEIR, social distancing, and age stratification. The effect of vertical confinement and release in Brazil // PLoS ONE 15, 9, 2020: e0237627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237627
- ↑ Barbarossa M.V., Fuhrmann J., Meinke J.H.,Krieg S., Varma H.V., Castelletti N., et al. Modeling the spread of COVID-19 in Germany: Early assessment and possible scenarios // PLoS ONE 15, 9,2020: e0238559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238559
- ↑ Perkins T.A., Cavany S.M., Moore S.M., Oidtman R.J., Lerch A., Poterek M. Estimating unobserved SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United States // PNAS 202005476, 2020, doi:10.1073/pnas.2005476117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005476117
- ↑ Saad-Roy, C.M., Wagner, C.E., Baker, R.E., Morris, S.E., Farrar, J., Graham, A.L., Levin, S.A., Metcalf, C.J.E. and Grenfell, B.T., 2020. Immune life-history, vaccination and the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 over the next five years // Science eabd7343, 2020, doi:10.1126/science.abd7343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd7343
- ↑ Brett, T.S., Rohani, P., 2020. Transmission dynamics reveal the impracticality of COVID-19 herd immunity strategies // PNAS, 2020, doi:10.1073/pnas.2008087117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008087117
- ↑ Wilder, B., Charpignon, M., Killian, J.A., Ou, H.C., Mate, A., Jabbari, S., Perrault, A., Desai, A.N., Tambe, M. and Majumder, M.S. Modeling between-population variation in COVID-19 dynamics in Hubei, Lombardy, and New York City. // PNAS, 2020, doi:10.1073/pnas.2010651117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010651117
- ↑ Reproducible simulation studies targeting COVID-19 // BiomodelsDB 2020. doi:https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/covid-19
- ↑ McCombs A., Kadelka C. A model-based evaluation of the efficacy of COVID-19 social distancing, testing and hospital triage policies. // PLoS Comput Biol, 2020, 16(10): e1008388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008388
- ↑ Russo L., Anastassopoulou C., Tsakris A., Bifulco G.N., Campana E.F., Toraldo G., et al. Tracing day-zero and forecasting the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: A compartmental modelling and numerical optimization approach.// PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(10): e0240649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240649
- ↑ Zhan C., Tse C.K., Fu Y., Lai Z., Zhang H. Modeling and prediction of the 2019 coronavirus disease spreading in China incorporating human migration data.// PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(10): e0241171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241171
- ↑ Chang, S.L., Harding, N., Zachreson, C. et al. Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.// Nat Commun, 2020, 11(5710) doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19393-6
- ↑ Català, M., Alonso, S., Alvarez-Lacalle, E., Lopez, D., Cardona, P-J., Prats, C. Empirical model for short-time prediction of COVID-19 spreading.// PLoS Comput Biol., 2020, 16(12): e1008431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008431